Abstract
The injection of water dissolved CO2 and H2S into basalts into the Nesjavellir geothermal system (Iceland) is to begin in 2022. This study is a pre-injection investigation assessing the likely response of the fluid-rock system to the gas charged water injection. The target aquifer has a temperature of < 200 °C at the injection well, but the temperature increases to ∼300 °C towards the center of the geothermal field where the production wells are located. The aquifer has current in-situ pH values of 6.7–7.7 and CO2 and H2S concentrations of 30.1–1079 and 60.4–505 ppm, respectively. These pre-injection aquifer fluids are saturated with respect to numerous sulfide minerals but undersaturated with respect to the major carbonate minerals. The fluid during the anticipated pilot carbon and sulfur charged water injection is expected to have a temperature of ∼84 °C, a pH of ∼4.9 and dissolved CO2 and H2S concentrations of 1223 and 480 ppm, respectively. Geochemical modelling confirms that the injection of CO2 and H2S charged fluids will dissolve the altered basaltic host rock near the injection well followed by the precipitation of secondary minerals including sulfides and carbonates further from the well. Calculations suggest about 70% and 100%, respectively, of this injected CO2 and H2S will be mineralized between the injection and production wells. The increasing of the CO2 and H2S content of the injection fluid will increase mineralization efficiency if the increased acidity of this fluid increases the mass of basalt dissolution in the subsurface. Carbon, sulfur and helium isotope systematics and abundances imply that large part of CO2 and H2S emitted from the Nesjavellir powerplant, as well as those released from the geothermal fluids naturally originate from magmatic sources. Mass balance considerations suggest that the currently planned dissolved gas injection into the Nesjavellir system will negligibly affect the CO2 and H2S budget of the aquifer. However, efforts to maximize the mineralization efficiency when upscaling this carbon storage system should be made to limit possible increase in reservoir fluid CO2 concentration.
| Original language | English |
|---|---|
| Article number | 103610 |
| Journal | International Journal of Greenhouse Gas Control |
| Volume | 115 |
| DOIs | |
| Publication status | Published - 1 Mar 2022 |
Bibliographical note
Funding Information: The authors would like to thank the associate editor Charles Jenkins and the anonymous reviewers for their constructive comments. We also would like to acknowledge the colleagues at the Institute of Earth Sciences, University of Iceland, Iceland Geosurvey, CarbFix, and Reykjavik Energy for fruitful discussions. This work is part of the GECO project and has received funding from the European Union's Horizon 2020 research and innovation programme under grant agreement No. 818169. Funding Information: The authors would like to thank the associate editor Charles Jenkins and the anonymous reviewers for their constructive comments. We also would like to acknowledge the colleagues at the Institute of Earth Sciences, University of Iceland, Iceland Geosurvey, CarbFix, and Reykjavik Energy for fruitful discussions. This work is part of the GECO project and has received funding from the European Union's Horizon 2020 research and innovation programme under grant agreement No. 818169. Publisher Copyright: © 2022Other keywords
- Carbon dioxide (CO)
- Geothermal
- Hydrogen sulfide (HS)
- Mineral storage
- Reaction path modelling