TY - JOUR
T1 - Association of respiratory symptoms and lung function with occupation in the multinational Burden of Obstructive Lung Disease (BOLD) study
AU - BOLD Collaborative Research Group
AU - Ratanachina, Jate
AU - Amaral, Andre F S
AU - De Matteis, Sara
AU - Lawin, Herve
AU - Mortimer, Kevin
AU - Obaseki, Daniel O
AU - Harrabi, Imed
AU - Denguezli, Meriam
AU - Wouters, Emiel F M
AU - Janson, Christer
AU - Nielsen, Rune
AU - Gulsvik, Amund
AU - Cherkaski, Hamid Hacene
AU - Mejza, Filip
AU - Mahesh, Padukudru Anand
AU - Elsony, Asma
AU - Ahmed, Rana
AU - Tan, Wan
AU - Loh, Li Cher
AU - Rashid, Abdul
AU - Studnicka, Michael
AU - Nafees, Asaad A
AU - Seemungal, Terence
AU - Aquart-Stewart, Althea
AU - Al Ghobain, Mohammed
AU - Zheng, Jinping
AU - Juvekar, Sanjay
AU - Salvi, Sundeep
AU - Jogi, Rain
AU - Mannino, David
AU - Gíslason, Þórarinn
AU - Buist, A Sonia
AU - Cullinan, Paul
AU - Burney, Peter
N1 - Copyright ©The authors 2023.
PY - 2023/1
Y1 - 2023/1
N2 - BACKGROUND: Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease has been associated with exposures in the workplace. We aimed to assess the association of respiratory symptoms and lung function with occupation in the Burden of Obstructive Lung Disease study.METHODS: We analysed cross-sectional data from 28 823 adults (≥40 years) in 34 countries. We considered 11 occupations and grouped them by likelihood of exposure to organic dusts, inorganic dusts and fumes. The association of chronic cough, chronic phlegm, wheeze, dyspnoea, forced vital capacity (FVC) and forced expiratory volume in 1 s (FEV1)/FVC with occupation was assessed, per study site, using multivariable regression. These estimates were then meta-analysed. Sensitivity analyses explored differences between sexes and gross national income.RESULTS: Overall, working in settings with potentially high exposure to dusts or fumes was associated with respiratory symptoms but not lung function differences. The most common occupation was farming. Compared to people not working in any of the 11 considered occupations, those who were farmers for ≥20 years were more likely to have chronic cough (OR 1.52, 95% CI 1.19-1.94), wheeze (OR 1.37, 95% CI 1.16-1.63) and dyspnoea (OR 1.83, 95% CI 1.53-2.20), but not lower FVC (β=0.02 L, 95% CI -0.02-0.06 L) or lower FEV1/FVC (β=0.04%, 95% CI -0.49-0.58%). Some findings differed by sex and gross national income.CONCLUSION: At a population level, the occupational exposures considered in this study do not appear to be major determinants of differences in lung function, although they are associated with more respiratory symptoms. Because not all work settings were included in this study, respiratory surveillance should still be encouraged among high-risk dusty and fume job workers, especially in low- and middle-income countries.
AB - BACKGROUND: Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease has been associated with exposures in the workplace. We aimed to assess the association of respiratory symptoms and lung function with occupation in the Burden of Obstructive Lung Disease study.METHODS: We analysed cross-sectional data from 28 823 adults (≥40 years) in 34 countries. We considered 11 occupations and grouped them by likelihood of exposure to organic dusts, inorganic dusts and fumes. The association of chronic cough, chronic phlegm, wheeze, dyspnoea, forced vital capacity (FVC) and forced expiratory volume in 1 s (FEV1)/FVC with occupation was assessed, per study site, using multivariable regression. These estimates were then meta-analysed. Sensitivity analyses explored differences between sexes and gross national income.RESULTS: Overall, working in settings with potentially high exposure to dusts or fumes was associated with respiratory symptoms but not lung function differences. The most common occupation was farming. Compared to people not working in any of the 11 considered occupations, those who were farmers for ≥20 years were more likely to have chronic cough (OR 1.52, 95% CI 1.19-1.94), wheeze (OR 1.37, 95% CI 1.16-1.63) and dyspnoea (OR 1.83, 95% CI 1.53-2.20), but not lower FVC (β=0.02 L, 95% CI -0.02-0.06 L) or lower FEV1/FVC (β=0.04%, 95% CI -0.49-0.58%). Some findings differed by sex and gross national income.CONCLUSION: At a population level, the occupational exposures considered in this study do not appear to be major determinants of differences in lung function, although they are associated with more respiratory symptoms. Because not all work settings were included in this study, respiratory surveillance should still be encouraged among high-risk dusty and fume job workers, especially in low- and middle-income countries.
KW - Adult
KW - Chronic Disease
KW - Cough/complications
KW - Cross-Sectional Studies
KW - Dyspnea/epidemiology
KW - Forced Expiratory Volume
KW - Humans
KW - Occupations
KW - Pulmonary Disease, Chronic Obstructive
KW - Vital Capacity
UR - https://www.scopus.com/pages/publications/85146364403
U2 - 10.1183/13993003.00469-2022
DO - 10.1183/13993003.00469-2022
M3 - Article
C2 - 36028253
SN - 0903-1936
VL - 61
JO - European respiratory journal : official journal of the European Society for Clinical Respiratory Physiology
JF - European respiratory journal : official journal of the European Society for Clinical Respiratory Physiology
IS - 1
M1 - 2200469
ER -