Abstract
The agreement between the Autism Diagnostic Interview-Revised (ADI-R) and the Childhood Autism Rating Scale (CARS) was investigated in the diagnostic assessment of 54 children aged 22-114 months referred for possible autism. The observed agreement between the two systems was 66.7% (Cohen's kappa = .40) when the ADI-R definition for autism was applied (i.e., scores reaching cutoff in three domains on the ADI-R), but increased considerably with less stringent criteria; that is, scores reaching cutoffs in two domains and in one domain on the ADI-R. As predicted, the CARS identified more cases of autism than the ADI-R. Children classified as autistic according to both instruments had significantly lower IQ/DQ and more severe autistic symptomatology than those classified with the CARS only.
| Original language | English |
|---|---|
| Pages (from-to) | 319-328 |
| Number of pages | 10 |
| Journal | Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders |
| Volume | 33 |
| Issue number | 3 |
| DOIs | |
| Publication status | Published - Jun 2003 |
Other keywords
- Autism
- Autism Diagnostic Interview-Revised
- Childhood Autism Rating Scale
- Diagnosis
Fingerprint
Dive into the research topics of 'Autism Diagnostic Interview-Revised and the Childhood Autism Rating Scale: Convergence and discrepancy in diagnosing autism'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.Cite this
- APA
- Author
- BIBTEX
- Harvard
- Standard
- RIS
- Vancouver