Skip to main navigation Skip to search Skip to main content

Comparison between two cardiac rehabilitation programs in iceland

  • Ö R. Amundadottir
  • , B. Magnusson
  • , M. B. Einarsson
  • , S. B. Sigurdsson
  • , Sæmundur Sveinsson

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

Abstract

Background: Heart patients who undergo phase II cardiac rehabilitation can choose between the following two rehabilitation programs: 1) A four week intensive inpatient rehabilitation at the rehabilitation center Reykjalundur: 2) The Heart and Lung Rehabilitation Center (HL center), an outpatient clinic where patients train three times a week for one hour at a time for 8-10 weeks. The purpose of this study was to compare the longtime outcome of the two rehabilitation programs. Method: Forty nine patients, after myocardial infarct and/or coronary operation (CABG, PTCA), entered the study. They fell into two rehabilitation groups who underwent rehabilitation at Reykjalundur or the HL center. Peak oxygen uptake, blood lactate build up and peak performance were measured by standard cardiopulmonary exrecise test before the phase II heart rehabilitation program immediately after and 13 months later .Thirty three patients concluded the study. Results: Mean peak oxygen uptake before the rehabilitation was 22,8 ml kg-1 min-1, after the phase II rehabilitation 26,0 ml kg-1 min-1 and thirteen months later 25,3 ml kg-1 min-1. Mean peak performance was respectively 153 W, 180 W and 174 W. Mean lactate threshold (4 mmol I'1) was at 126 W, 136 W and 138 W The improvement in these three measurements over the study period was statistically significant whereas we found no statistically significant difference between the two programs. Quality of life was measured by a standardized questionaire before the phase II rehabilitation and thirteen months after conclusion of the phase II rehabilitation. Four out of twelve factors measured where significantly improved at the end of the study. However there was no statistically significant difference beween programs. Conclusions: The results of phase II heart rehabilitation in Iceland is in accord with previous studies (+10-20%) and no significant statistical difference was found between those two rehabilitation programs.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)44
Number of pages1
JournalScandinavian Cardiovascular Journal, Supplement
Volume33
Issue number51
Publication statusPublished - 1999

UN SDGs

This output contributes to the following UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)

  1. SDG 1 - No Poverty
    SDG 1 No Poverty
  2. SDG 2 - Zero Hunger
    SDG 2 Zero Hunger
  3. SDG 3 - Good Health and Well-being
    SDG 3 Good Health and Well-being
  4. SDG 4 - Quality Education
    SDG 4 Quality Education
  5. SDG 5 - Gender Equality
    SDG 5 Gender Equality
  6. SDG 6 - Clean Water and Sanitation
    SDG 6 Clean Water and Sanitation
  7. SDG 7 - Affordable and Clean Energy
    SDG 7 Affordable and Clean Energy
  8. SDG 8 - Decent Work and Economic Growth
    SDG 8 Decent Work and Economic Growth
  9. SDG 9 - Industry, Innovation, and Infrastructure
    SDG 9 Industry, Innovation, and Infrastructure
  10. SDG 10 - Reduced Inequalities
    SDG 10 Reduced Inequalities
  11. SDG 11 - Sustainable Cities and Communities
    SDG 11 Sustainable Cities and Communities
  12. SDG 12 - Responsible Consumption and Production
    SDG 12 Responsible Consumption and Production
  13. SDG 13 - Climate Action
    SDG 13 Climate Action
  14. SDG 14 - Life Below Water
    SDG 14 Life Below Water
  15. SDG 15 - Life on Land
    SDG 15 Life on Land
  16. SDG 16 - Peace, Justice and Strong Institutions
    SDG 16 Peace, Justice and Strong Institutions
  17. SDG 17 - Partnerships for the Goals
    SDG 17 Partnerships for the Goals

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Comparison between two cardiac rehabilitation programs in iceland'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this