TY - JOUR
T1 - Cyclical geothermal unrest as a precursor to Iceland’s 2021 Fagradalsfjall eruption
AU - Flóvenz, Ólafur G.
AU - Wang, Rongjiang
AU - Hersir, Gylfi Páll
AU - Dahm, Torsten
AU - Hainzl, Sebastian
AU - Vassileva, Magdalena
AU - Drouin, Vincent
AU - Heimann, Sebastian
AU - Isken, Marius Paul
AU - Gudnason, Egill
AU - Ágústsson, Kristján
AU - Ágústsdóttir, Thorbjörg
AU - Horálek, Josef
AU - Motagh, Mahdi
AU - Walter, Thomas R.
AU - Rivalta, Eleonora
AU - Jousset, Philippe
AU - Krawczyk, Charlotte M.
AU - Milkereit, Claus
N1 - Publisher Copyright: © 2022, The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer Nature Limited.
PY - 2022/5
Y1 - 2022/5
N2 - Understanding and constraining the source of geodetic deformation in volcanic areas is an important component of hazard assessment. Here, we analyse deformation and seismicity for one year before the March 2021 Fagradalsfjall eruption in Iceland. We generate a high-resolution catalogue of 39,500 earthquakes using optical cable recordings and develop a poroelastic model to describe three pre-eruptional uplift and subsidence cycles at the Svartsengi geothermal field, 8 km west of the eruption site. We find the observed deformation is best explained by cyclic intrusions into a permeable aquifer by a fluid injected at 4 km depth below the geothermal field, with a total volume of 0.11 ± 0.05 km3 and a density of 850 ± 350 kg m–3. We therefore suggest that ingression of magmatic CO2 can explain the geodetic, gravity and seismic data, although some contribution of magma cannot be excluded.
AB - Understanding and constraining the source of geodetic deformation in volcanic areas is an important component of hazard assessment. Here, we analyse deformation and seismicity for one year before the March 2021 Fagradalsfjall eruption in Iceland. We generate a high-resolution catalogue of 39,500 earthquakes using optical cable recordings and develop a poroelastic model to describe three pre-eruptional uplift and subsidence cycles at the Svartsengi geothermal field, 8 km west of the eruption site. We find the observed deformation is best explained by cyclic intrusions into a permeable aquifer by a fluid injected at 4 km depth below the geothermal field, with a total volume of 0.11 ± 0.05 km3 and a density of 850 ± 350 kg m–3. We therefore suggest that ingression of magmatic CO2 can explain the geodetic, gravity and seismic data, although some contribution of magma cannot be excluded.
UR - https://www.scopus.com/pages/publications/85129252410
U2 - 10.1038/s41561-022-00930-5
DO - 10.1038/s41561-022-00930-5
M3 - Article
SN - 1752-0894
VL - 15
SP - 397
EP - 404
JO - Nature Geoscience
JF - Nature Geoscience
IS - 5
ER -