TY - JOUR
T1 - Disparities in the organisation of national healthcare systems for treatment of patients with psoriatic arthritis and axial spondyloarthritis across Europe
AU - Michelsen, Brigitte
AU - Østergaard, Mikkel
AU - Nissen, Michael John
AU - Ciurea, Adrian
AU - Möller, Burkhard
AU - Midtbøll Ørnbjerg, Lykke
AU - Horák, Pavel
AU - Glintborg, Bente
AU - MacDonald, Alan
AU - Laas, Karin
AU - Sokka-Isler, Tuulikki
AU - Guðbjörnsson, Björn
AU - Iannone, Florenzo
AU - Hellamand, Pasoon
AU - Kvien, Tore Kristian
AU - Rodrigues, Ana Maria
AU - Codreanu, Catalin
AU - Rotar, Ziga
AU - Castrejón, Isabel
AU - Wallman, Johan Karlsson
AU - Pavelka, Karel
AU - Loft, Anne Gitte
AU - Heddle, Maureen
AU - Vorobjov, Sigrid
AU - Relas, Heikki
AU - Gröndal, Gerður María
AU - Gremese, Elisa
AU - van der Horst-Bruinsma, Irene
AU - Kristianslund, Eirik Klami
AU - Santos, Maria José
AU - Mogosan, Corina
AU - Tomsic, Matija
AU - Diaz-Gonzalez, Federico
AU - Giuseppe, Daniela Di
AU - Nielsen, Stig Winther
AU - Hetland, Merete Lund
N1 - Publisher Copyright: © 2025
PY - 2025/6
Y1 - 2025/6
N2 - Background: Studies on national policies for biologics are warranted. Objectives: To map and compare national healthcare set-ups for prescription, start, switch, tapering, and discontinuation of biologic/targeted synthetic disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs (DMARDs) in patients with psoriatic arthritis and axial spondyloarthritis across Europe, and assess the healthcare set-ups in relation to countries’ socio-economic status. Methods: An electronic survey was developed to collect and compare information on national healthcare systems. The relationship between the cumulative score of biologic/targeted synthetic DMARD regulations, socioeconomic indices, and biologic originator costs were assessed by linear regression. Results: National healthcare set-ups differed considerably across the 15 countries, with significantly fewer regulations with increasing socioeconomic status measured by GDP/current health expenditure/human development index, and with increasing biologic originator costs. In most countries, the biologic/targeted synthetic DMARD prescribing doctor was required to adhere to country and/or hospital recommendations, and about a third of countries had a national/regional tender process. Prescription regulations for biologic/targeted synthetic DMARDs, including pre-treatment and disease activity requirements, varied substantially. Approximately a third of countries had criteria for discontinuation and tapering, whereas only few had for switching. Notably, two countries disallowed biologic/targeted synthetic DMARD retrials, and one imposed limit on the maximum number of biologic/targeted synthetic DMARDs permitted. Conclusion: The findings highlight substantial variability in healthcare set-ups for biologic/targeted synthetic DMARD use in psoriatic arthritis and axial spondyloarthritis across Europe and their association with socioeconomic status and drug costs. These insights provide a basis for rheumatology societies, policymakers, and stakeholders to evaluate and potentially optimize healthcare policies.
AB - Background: Studies on national policies for biologics are warranted. Objectives: To map and compare national healthcare set-ups for prescription, start, switch, tapering, and discontinuation of biologic/targeted synthetic disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs (DMARDs) in patients with psoriatic arthritis and axial spondyloarthritis across Europe, and assess the healthcare set-ups in relation to countries’ socio-economic status. Methods: An electronic survey was developed to collect and compare information on national healthcare systems. The relationship between the cumulative score of biologic/targeted synthetic DMARD regulations, socioeconomic indices, and biologic originator costs were assessed by linear regression. Results: National healthcare set-ups differed considerably across the 15 countries, with significantly fewer regulations with increasing socioeconomic status measured by GDP/current health expenditure/human development index, and with increasing biologic originator costs. In most countries, the biologic/targeted synthetic DMARD prescribing doctor was required to adhere to country and/or hospital recommendations, and about a third of countries had a national/regional tender process. Prescription regulations for biologic/targeted synthetic DMARDs, including pre-treatment and disease activity requirements, varied substantially. Approximately a third of countries had criteria for discontinuation and tapering, whereas only few had for switching. Notably, two countries disallowed biologic/targeted synthetic DMARD retrials, and one imposed limit on the maximum number of biologic/targeted synthetic DMARDs permitted. Conclusion: The findings highlight substantial variability in healthcare set-ups for biologic/targeted synthetic DMARD use in psoriatic arthritis and axial spondyloarthritis across Europe and their association with socioeconomic status and drug costs. These insights provide a basis for rheumatology societies, policymakers, and stakeholders to evaluate and potentially optimize healthcare policies.
KW - Access to health care
KW - Axial spondyloarthritis
KW - Biologic therapy
KW - Health policy
KW - Psoriatic arthritis
KW - Socioeconomic health disparities
KW - gigtarlæknisfræði
UR - https://www.scopus.com/pages/publications/105002648844
U2 - 10.1016/j.healthpol.2025.105311
DO - 10.1016/j.healthpol.2025.105311
M3 - Review article
SN - 0168-8510
VL - 156
JO - Health Policy
JF - Health Policy
M1 - 105311
ER -