Disparities in the organisation of national healthcare systems for treatment of patients with psoriatic arthritis and axial spondyloarthritis across Europe

  • Brigitte Michelsen
  • , Mikkel Østergaard
  • , Michael John Nissen
  • , Adrian Ciurea
  • , Burkhard Möller
  • , Lykke Midtbøll Ørnbjerg
  • , Pavel Horák
  • , Bente Glintborg
  • , Alan MacDonald
  • , Karin Laas
  • , Tuulikki Sokka-Isler
  • , Björn Guðbjörnsson
  • , Florenzo Iannone
  • , Pasoon Hellamand
  • , Tore Kristian Kvien
  • , Ana Maria Rodrigues
  • , Catalin Codreanu
  • , Ziga Rotar
  • , Isabel Castrejón
  • , Johan Karlsson Wallman
  • Karel Pavelka, Anne Gitte Loft, Maureen Heddle, Sigrid Vorobjov, Heikki Relas, Gerður María Gröndal, Elisa Gremese, Irene van der Horst-Bruinsma, Eirik Klami Kristianslund, Maria José Santos, Corina Mogosan, Matija Tomsic, Federico Diaz-Gonzalez, Daniela Di Giuseppe, Stig Winther Nielsen, Merete Lund Hetland

Research output: Contribution to journalReview articlepeer-review

Abstract

Background: Studies on national policies for biologics are warranted. Objectives: To map and compare national healthcare set-ups for prescription, start, switch, tapering, and discontinuation of biologic/targeted synthetic disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs (DMARDs) in patients with psoriatic arthritis and axial spondyloarthritis across Europe, and assess the healthcare set-ups in relation to countries’ socio-economic status. Methods: An electronic survey was developed to collect and compare information on national healthcare systems. The relationship between the cumulative score of biologic/targeted synthetic DMARD regulations, socioeconomic indices, and biologic originator costs were assessed by linear regression. Results: National healthcare set-ups differed considerably across the 15 countries, with significantly fewer regulations with increasing socioeconomic status measured by GDP/current health expenditure/human development index, and with increasing biologic originator costs. In most countries, the biologic/targeted synthetic DMARD prescribing doctor was required to adhere to country and/or hospital recommendations, and about a third of countries had a national/regional tender process. Prescription regulations for biologic/targeted synthetic DMARDs, including pre-treatment and disease activity requirements, varied substantially. Approximately a third of countries had criteria for discontinuation and tapering, whereas only few had for switching. Notably, two countries disallowed biologic/targeted synthetic DMARD retrials, and one imposed limit on the maximum number of biologic/targeted synthetic DMARDs permitted. Conclusion: The findings highlight substantial variability in healthcare set-ups for biologic/targeted synthetic DMARD use in psoriatic arthritis and axial spondyloarthritis across Europe and their association with socioeconomic status and drug costs. These insights provide a basis for rheumatology societies, policymakers, and stakeholders to evaluate and potentially optimize healthcare policies.

Original languageEnglish
Article number105311
JournalHealth Policy
Volume156
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Jun 2025

Bibliographical note

Publisher Copyright: © 2025

Other keywords

  • Access to health care
  • Axial spondyloarthritis
  • Biologic therapy
  • Health policy
  • Psoriatic arthritis
  • Socioeconomic health disparities
  • gigtarlæknisfræði

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Disparities in the organisation of national healthcare systems for treatment of patients with psoriatic arthritis and axial spondyloarthritis across Europe'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this