TY - JOUR
T1 - Germline testing for patients with BRCA1/2 mutations on somatic tumor testing
AU - Vlessis, Katherine
AU - Purington, Natasha
AU - Chun, Nicolette
AU - Haraldsdottir, Sigurdis
AU - Ford, James M.
N1 - Publisher Copyright: © The Author(s) 2020. Published by Oxford University Press.
PY - 2020/2/1
Y1 - 2020/2/1
N2 - Background: The National Comprehensive Cancer Network (NCCN) recommends germline testing for pathogenic BRCA1/2 mutations identified by somatic tumor sequencing. The aim of this study was to explore whether patients at Stanford with somatic BRCA1/2 mutations were recommended germline testing in accordance with NCCN guidelines. Methods: We retrospectively collected all Stanford patients with BRCA1/2 mutations found by tumor sequencing. Medical records were reviewed for each patient to identify those recommended germline testing. A multivariable logistic regression model was fit associating baseline characteristics with whether or not a recommendation was made. Results: Of 164 participants, 51 (31.1%) had no recommendation for germline testing. Of the 97 available germline-testing results, 54 (55.7%) were positive for pathogenic BRCA1/2 mutations. After adjusting for possible confounders, patients with genitourinary cancer (odds ratio [OR] = 0.03, 95% confidence interval [CI] = 0.00 to 0.03; P =.003), lung cancer (OR = 0.04, 95% CI = 0.01 to 0.21; P <.001), sarcoma (OR = 0.02, 95% CI = 0.00 to 0.14; P <.001), skin cancer (OR = 0.01, 95% CI = 0.98 to 1.03; P =.002), or "other" diagnoses (OR = 0.01, 95% CI = 0.00 to 0.16; P <.001) were statistically significantly less likely to be recommended germline testing compared with patients with breast or gynecological cancers. Conclusions: Our study highlights the importance of provider education outside of the oncologic specialties typically associated with BRCA-related cancers and continued exploration of referrals to genetics for germline testing on the basis of somatic findings.
AB - Background: The National Comprehensive Cancer Network (NCCN) recommends germline testing for pathogenic BRCA1/2 mutations identified by somatic tumor sequencing. The aim of this study was to explore whether patients at Stanford with somatic BRCA1/2 mutations were recommended germline testing in accordance with NCCN guidelines. Methods: We retrospectively collected all Stanford patients with BRCA1/2 mutations found by tumor sequencing. Medical records were reviewed for each patient to identify those recommended germline testing. A multivariable logistic regression model was fit associating baseline characteristics with whether or not a recommendation was made. Results: Of 164 participants, 51 (31.1%) had no recommendation for germline testing. Of the 97 available germline-testing results, 54 (55.7%) were positive for pathogenic BRCA1/2 mutations. After adjusting for possible confounders, patients with genitourinary cancer (odds ratio [OR] = 0.03, 95% confidence interval [CI] = 0.00 to 0.03; P =.003), lung cancer (OR = 0.04, 95% CI = 0.01 to 0.21; P <.001), sarcoma (OR = 0.02, 95% CI = 0.00 to 0.14; P <.001), skin cancer (OR = 0.01, 95% CI = 0.98 to 1.03; P =.002), or "other" diagnoses (OR = 0.01, 95% CI = 0.00 to 0.16; P <.001) were statistically significantly less likely to be recommended germline testing compared with patients with breast or gynecological cancers. Conclusions: Our study highlights the importance of provider education outside of the oncologic specialties typically associated with BRCA-related cancers and continued exploration of referrals to genetics for germline testing on the basis of somatic findings.
UR - https://www.scopus.com/pages/publications/85087186125
U2 - 10.1093/jncics/pkz095
DO - 10.1093/jncics/pkz095
M3 - Article
SN - 2515-5091
VL - 4
JO - JNCI Cancer Spectrum
JF - JNCI Cancer Spectrum
IS - 1
M1 - pkz095
ER -