Much ado about aboutness

Sam Baron, Reginald Mary Chua, Kristie Miller, James Norton

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

Abstract

Strong non-maximalism holds that some truths require no ontological ground of any sort. Strong non-maximalism allows one to accept that some propositions are true without being forced to endorse any corresponding ontological commitments. We show that there is a version of truthmaker theory available–anti-aboutness truthmaking–that enjoys the dialectical benefits of the strong non-maximalist’s position. According to anti-aboutness truthmaking, all truths require grounds, but a proposition need not be grounded in the very thing(s) that the proposition is about. We argue that if strong non-maximalism can be defended, then so can anti-aboutness truthmaking on the very same basis; one can enjoy the benefits of strong non-maximalism without giving up on the idea that truth is always grounded in being.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)298-326
Number of pages29
JournalInquiry (United Kingdom)
Volume65
Issue number3
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 18 Mar 2019

Bibliographical note

Funding Information: This work was supported by Australian Research Council: [Grant Number DP180100105,FT170100262Â]. Publisher Copyright: © 2019 Informa UK Limited, trading as Taylor & Francis Group.

Other keywords

  • Aboutness
  • explanation
  • ontology
  • truthmaker non-maximalism
  • truthmaker theory

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Much ado about aboutness'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this