Abstract
Strong non-maximalism holds that some truths require no ontological ground of any sort. Strong non-maximalism allows one to accept that some propositions are true without being forced to endorse any corresponding ontological commitments. We show that there is a version of truthmaker theory available–anti-aboutness truthmaking–that enjoys the dialectical benefits of the strong non-maximalist’s position. According to anti-aboutness truthmaking, all truths require grounds, but a proposition need not be grounded in the very thing(s) that the proposition is about. We argue that if strong non-maximalism can be defended, then so can anti-aboutness truthmaking on the very same basis; one can enjoy the benefits of strong non-maximalism without giving up on the idea that truth is always grounded in being.
| Original language | English |
|---|---|
| Pages (from-to) | 298-326 |
| Number of pages | 29 |
| Journal | Inquiry (United Kingdom) |
| Volume | 65 |
| Issue number | 3 |
| DOIs | |
| Publication status | Published - 18 Mar 2019 |
Bibliographical note
Funding Information: This work was supported by Australian Research Council: [Grant Number DP180100105,FT170100262Â]. Publisher Copyright: © 2019 Informa UK Limited, trading as Taylor & Francis Group.Other keywords
- Aboutness
- explanation
- ontology
- truthmaker non-maximalism
- truthmaker theory