Notation’s struggle to the surface (or, towards concrete notation)

Einar Torfi Einarsson

Notation’s struggle to the surface (or, towards concrete notation)

Einar Torfi Einarsson

Department of Music

Iceland University of the Arts, Other Icelandic Research Institutions

Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceeding › Conference contribution

Abstract

Notation is a system within a system. It has evolved in between or amidst the composer and the performer/instrument and has had a clear position (composer-score-performer), functionality (communication tool and performer engagement), and directionality (towards performative sonic results). Despite its multifarious paths and appearances it has remained in the background or as a secondary aspect of music (sound being dominant). But could notation denature or leave behind its symbolism, its reference system or its place in the system it evolved within? Does it have an escape route? In this talk I will trace and propose a (im)possible evolution of a strand of notation called prescriptive notation and explore another notational directionality, leading to experimental fusion of material and notation, or something I’m calling concrete notation where notation examines and questions its own functionality and history.

Original language	English
Title of host publication	New Notations Symposium
Subtitle of host publication	A Symposium on Notation for New Instruments and Musical Expression
Publication status	Published - 22 Sept 2016

Bibliographical note

New Notations Symposium A Symposium on Notation for New Instruments and Musical Expression September 22nd, 2016 Chair Thor Magnusson (University of Sussex) invited by the ISMM team @IRCAM - Centre Pompidou Paris, STMS Lab IRCAM-CNRS-UPMC

Access to Document

https://medias.ircam.fr/xc5c5be

Cite this

@inproceedings{7bd63f547ada4420826bde25ee701e14,

title = "Notation{\textquoteright}s struggle to the surface (or, towards concrete notation)",

abstract = "Notation is a system within a system. It has evolved in between or amidst the composer and the performer/instrument and has had a clear position (composer-score-performer), functionality (communication tool and performer engagement), and directionality (towards performative sonic results). Despite its multifarious paths and appearances it has remained in the background or as a secondary aspect of music (sound being dominant). But could notation denature or leave behind its symbolism, its reference system or its place in the system it evolved within? Does it have an escape route? In this talk I will trace and propose a (im)possible evolution of a strand of notation called prescriptive notation and explore another notational directionality, leading to experimental fusion of material and notation, or something I{\textquoteright}m calling concrete notation where notation examines and questions its own functionality and history.",

keywords = "experimental notation, prescriptive notation, concrete notation, heterarchy, productive forces",

author = "Einarsson, \{Einar Torfi\}",

note = "New Notations Symposium A Symposium on Notation for New Instruments and Musical Expression September 22nd, 2016 Chair Thor Magnusson (University of Sussex) invited by the ISMM team @IRCAM - Centre Pompidou Paris, STMS Lab IRCAM-CNRS-UPMC",

year = "2016",

month = sep,

day = "22",

language = "English",

booktitle = "New Notations Symposium",

}

TY - GEN

T1 - Notation’s struggle to the surface (or, towards concrete notation)

AU - Einarsson, Einar Torfi

N1 - New Notations Symposium A Symposium on Notation for New Instruments and Musical Expression September 22nd, 2016 Chair Thor Magnusson (University of Sussex) invited by the ISMM team @IRCAM - Centre Pompidou Paris, STMS Lab IRCAM-CNRS-UPMC

PY - 2016/9/22

Y1 - 2016/9/22

N2 - Notation is a system within a system. It has evolved in between or amidst the composer and the performer/instrument and has had a clear position (composer-score-performer), functionality (communication tool and performer engagement), and directionality (towards performative sonic results). Despite its multifarious paths and appearances it has remained in the background or as a secondary aspect of music (sound being dominant). But could notation denature or leave behind its symbolism, its reference system or its place in the system it evolved within? Does it have an escape route? In this talk I will trace and propose a (im)possible evolution of a strand of notation called prescriptive notation and explore another notational directionality, leading to experimental fusion of material and notation, or something I’m calling concrete notation where notation examines and questions its own functionality and history.

AB - Notation is a system within a system. It has evolved in between or amidst the composer and the performer/instrument and has had a clear position (composer-score-performer), functionality (communication tool and performer engagement), and directionality (towards performative sonic results). Despite its multifarious paths and appearances it has remained in the background or as a secondary aspect of music (sound being dominant). But could notation denature or leave behind its symbolism, its reference system or its place in the system it evolved within? Does it have an escape route? In this talk I will trace and propose a (im)possible evolution of a strand of notation called prescriptive notation and explore another notational directionality, leading to experimental fusion of material and notation, or something I’m calling concrete notation where notation examines and questions its own functionality and history.

KW - experimental notation

KW - prescriptive notation

KW - concrete notation

KW - heterarchy

KW - productive forces

UR - https://thormagnusson.github.io/ircam/

M3 - Conference contribution

BT - New Notations Symposium

ER -