Skip to main navigation Skip to search Skip to main content

Reply to comment on “Long or short silicic magma residence time beneath Hekla volcano, Iceland?” by Sigmarsson O, Bergþórsdóttir I A, Devidal J-L, Larsen G, Gannoun A

Research output: Contribution to journalComment/debate

Abstract

We would like to thank Geist et al. (Contrib Miner Petrol, 2023) for the opportunity to further discuss the arguments presented in our paper “Long or short silicic magma residence time beneath Hekla volcano, Iceland?” (Sigmarsson et al. Contrib Miner Petrol 177:13, 2022). The disagreement centers around the origin of the silicic magmas at Hekla, namely whether it is by (1) fractional crystallization and a long crustal residence time before eruption or (2) partial melting of altered basaltic crust and short transfer time to the surface. We disagree with the arguments presented by Geist et al. (Contrib Miner Petrol, 2023) against the model for the origin of dacite at Hekla from dehydration melting of amphibolite, a model that still explains most if not all results obtained so far on the Hekla magma suite.

Original languageEnglish
Article number72
JournalContributions to Mineralogy and Petrology
Volume178
Issue number10
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Oct 2023

Bibliographical note

Publisher Copyright: © 2023, The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature.

Other keywords

  • Amphibolite dehydration melting
  • Hekla volcano
  • Silicic magma
  • Th isotopes
  • Th/U

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Reply to comment on “Long or short silicic magma residence time beneath Hekla volcano, Iceland?” by Sigmarsson O, Bergþórsdóttir I A, Devidal J-L, Larsen G, Gannoun A'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this