Reply to: “The diamine cation is not a chemical example where density functional theory fails”

Xinxin Cheng, Elvar Jónsson, Hannes Jónsson, Peter M. Weber

Research output: Contribution to journal › Letter › peer-review

Access to Document

@article{f25540a4ee8f4d03b30a074754fb4bc2,

title = "Reply to: “The diamine cation is not a chemical example where density functional theory fails”",

author = "Xinxin Cheng and Elvar J{\'o}nsson and Hannes J{\'o}nsson and Weber, \{Peter M.\}",

year = "2018",

month = dec,

day = "1",

doi = "10.1038/s41467-018-07683-z",

language = "English",

volume = "9",

journal = "Nature Communications",

issn = "2041-1723",

publisher = "Nature Research",

number = "1",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Reply to

T2 - “The diamine cation is not a chemical example where density functional theory fails”

AU - Cheng, Xinxin

AU - Jónsson, Elvar

AU - Jónsson, Hannes

AU - Weber, Peter M.

PY - 2018/12/1

Y1 - 2018/12/1

UR - https://www.scopus.com/pages/publications/85058762592

U2 - 10.1038/s41467-018-07683-z

DO - 10.1038/s41467-018-07683-z

M3 - Letter

C2 - 30559404

SN - 2041-1723

VL - 9

JO - Nature Communications

JF - Nature Communications

IS - 1

M1 - 5348

ER -