Robot-assisted nephroureterectomy for upper tract urothelial carcinoma—feasibility and complications: a single center experience

F. Liedberg, J. Abrahamsson, J. Bobjer, Sigurður Guðjónsson, A. Löfgren, M. Nyberg, A. Sörenby

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

Abstract

Background: Robot-assisted nephroureterectomy (RANU) is the primary treatment for upper tract urothelial carcinoma (UTUC) at our hospital for patients with clinical stage less than T2, and for patients with invasive tumours, but unfit for major surgery. Objective: To assess peri-operative conditions and outcomes of RANU at our unit, and to evaluate the safety of the procedure. Methods: The medical records of all 166 patients undergoing RANU for suspected UTUC and followed for more than three months in a large university hospital in Sweden were reviewed retrospectively. After the exclusion of twenty patients because of previous cystectomy, simultaneous surgical procedure, or other tumour types than UTUC in the pathological report, 146 patients remained for the analyses. The primary endpoint was complication rate according to Clavien-Dindo at 90 days. Secondary endpoints were perioperative bleeding, violation of oncological surgical principles, hospital stay, and re-admission within 90 days. Results: The median age was 75 [(Inter Quartile Range) IQR 70–80] years and 57% of the patients had an ASA score above 2. According to Clavien-Dindo, one patient had a grade 3 complication, and no patient had a grade 4–5 complication. The median blood loss was 50 (IQR 20–100) ml and the median hospital stay was 6 (IQR 5–7) days. Twelve patients were re-admitted to the hospital within 90 days (eight with urinary tract infection/haematuria, one with hematoma, and three with other diseases). Conclusion: Robot-assisted nephroureterectomy is a safe procedure for patients with upper tract urothelial carcinoma, with a low risk of major surgical complications.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)301-307
Number of pages7
JournalScandinavian Journal of Urology
Volume56
Issue number4
Early online date23 Jun 2022
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 23 Jun 2022

Bibliographical note

Funding Information: This work was supported by the Swedish Cancer Society (grant numbers CAN 2017/278 and 2020/0709), Lund Medical Faculty (ALF), Skåne University Hospital Research Funds, the Gyllenstierna Krapperup’s Foundation, Skåne County Council’s Research and Development Foundation (REGSKANE-622351), Gösta Jönsson Research Foundation, the Foundation of Urological Research (Ove and Carin Carlsson Bladder Cancer Donation), and Hillevi Fries Research Foundation. The funding sources had no role in the study design, data analyses, interpretation of the results, or writing the manuscript. Publisher Copyright: © 2022 Acta Chirurgica Scandinavica Society.

Other keywords

  • Aged
  • Carcinoma, Transitional Cell/pathology
  • Feasibility Studies
  • Humans
  • Nephroureterectomy/methods
  • Retrospective Studies
  • Robotics/methods
  • Treatment Outcome
  • Upper tract urothelial carcinoma
  • Urinary Bladder Neoplasms/surgery
  • complications
  • nephroureterectomy
  • peri-operative outcome
  • robot-assisted surgery

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Robot-assisted nephroureterectomy for upper tract urothelial carcinoma—feasibility and complications: a single center experience'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this