Skip to main navigation Skip to search Skip to main content

The Beck Depression Inventory Second Edition (BDI-II): Psychometric properties in Icelandic student and patient populations

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

Abstract

The Beck Depression Inventory (BDI) is one of the most widely used self-report measures of depression in both research and clinical practice. The Beck Depression Inventory Second Edition (BDI-II) is the most recent version of the BDI. The objective of the present study was to assess the psychometric foundations of the Icelandic translation of the BDI-II, adding to its international knowledge base. Participants were in total 1454, 1206 students and 248 outpatient-clinic patients. All students completed the BDI-II and a subgroup (n = 142) completed additional measures of anxiety and depression. The Mini-International Psychiatric Interview (MINI) and the BDI-II were administrated to the patients. Convergent and divergent validity of the BDI-II were supported. It discriminated satisfactorily between patients diagnosed and those not diagnosed with major depression. Confirmatory factor analyses revealed small differences between various factor models of the BDI-II, derived from previous studies. However, a model of three first-order factors (cognitive-affective-somatic) and one second-order factor (general depression) offered an acceptable description of the item covariance structure for the BDI-II in both samples. It is concluded that the psychometric properties of the Icelandic version of the BDI-II are supported in patient and student populations.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)360-365
Number of pages6
JournalNordic Journal of Psychiatry
Volume62
Issue number5
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2008

Other keywords

  • BDI-II
  • Confirmatory factor analysis
  • Depression
  • Patient population
  • Student population

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'The Beck Depression Inventory Second Edition (BDI-II): Psychometric properties in Icelandic student and patient populations'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this