TY - JOUR
T1 - Triggered fault slip on June 17, 2000 on the Reykjanes Peninsula, SW-Iceland captured by radar interferometry
AU - Pagli, Carolina
AU - Pedersen, Rikke
AU - Sigmundsson, Freysteinn
AU - Feigl, Kurt L.
N1 - Publisher Copyright: © Copyright 2003 by the American Geophysical Union.
PY - 2003/3/15
Y1 - 2003/3/15
N2 - Dynamically triggered seismicity followed shortly after a Ms 6.6 earthquake in Iceland on June 17, 2000. Smaller earthquakes occurred on the Reykjanes Peninsula up to 100 km from the mainshock rupture. Using interferometric analysis of Synthetic Aperture Radar images (InSAR), we measure crustal deformation associated with three triggered deformation events. The largest of these occurred at Lake Kleifarvatn, 85 km west of the mainshock epicenter. Modeling of the InSAR data reveals strikeslip on a north-striking fault, with a geodetic moment of 6.2 × 1017 Nm, equivalent to magnitude Mw 5.8 earthquake. A seismological estimate of the moment is not yet available, because the seismic signature of this event is partly hidden by the mainshock waveform. The paucity of aftershocks on the triggered rupture plane suggests some aseismic slip there, compatible with a thin seismogenic crust, high heat-flow, hydrothermal alteration and the presence of fluids in the area.
AB - Dynamically triggered seismicity followed shortly after a Ms 6.6 earthquake in Iceland on June 17, 2000. Smaller earthquakes occurred on the Reykjanes Peninsula up to 100 km from the mainshock rupture. Using interferometric analysis of Synthetic Aperture Radar images (InSAR), we measure crustal deformation associated with three triggered deformation events. The largest of these occurred at Lake Kleifarvatn, 85 km west of the mainshock epicenter. Modeling of the InSAR data reveals strikeslip on a north-striking fault, with a geodetic moment of 6.2 × 1017 Nm, equivalent to magnitude Mw 5.8 earthquake. A seismological estimate of the moment is not yet available, because the seismic signature of this event is partly hidden by the mainshock waveform. The paucity of aftershocks on the triggered rupture plane suggests some aseismic slip there, compatible with a thin seismogenic crust, high heat-flow, hydrothermal alteration and the presence of fluids in the area.
UR - https://www.scopus.com/pages/publications/84954082351
U2 - 10.1029/2002GL015310
DO - 10.1029/2002GL015310
M3 - Article
SN - 0094-8276
VL - 30
JO - Geophysical Research Letters
JF - Geophysical Research Letters
IS - 6
M1 - 1273
ER -